Fighting the Asymmetry of Government 2.0

Updated 1 month ago

Source: http://blogs.gartner.com/

Most conversations about Government 2.0 assume that:

Government provides data to citizens to provide openness and transparency

Citizens engage with government to improve policy-making and service delivery

This approach implies that data flows from government to citizens and engagement flows from citizen to government. This is what I call the asymmetry of Government 2.0, since flows appear to be somewhat mono-directional, or very biased in a single direction. But these capture ...

  • 35 comments on this story
PRO

50% positive

Showing 11 relevant reactions out of 35.

AndreaDiMaio 2 months ago on Twitter

@bxmx but open data is only one aspect, see http://bit.ly/3TRpRA

Reply

Filling the glass to half empty | Public Strategist 2 months, 3 weeks ago on Wordpress

[...] this is a good point to bring in another of Andrea’s recent blog posts, on the asymmetry of government 2.0: Government 2.0 implies a bidirectional flow of information and services. It will require business [...]

Reply

Government 2.0: Lost in EU Declaration 2 months, 3 weeks ago on Wordpress

[...] (through reuse of public information) while engagement flows from citizens to government. However, as indicated in a previous post, the reverse flows are equally if not more important. Information must flows from existing [...]

Reply

Chris Parente 2 months, 4 weeks ago on Wordpress

Andrea — good piece. No question the flow has to be two way. First step was for government to get much better at making the right information very easy for citizens to find/access. Call that Gov’t 1.5. Next step is engaged citizens impacting their government. It will become apparent quicker i think at local/municipal level.

Segue — cool announcement today by GovLoop —
... See all content

Reply

erovira 2 months, 4 weeks ago on Twitter

'The assumption that citizens are mostly on the receiving end of open data and mashups needs to be changed' http://tinyurl.com/y98pv9y

Reply

fantomplanet 2 months, 4 weeks ago on Twitter

I like how this woman thinks. Friggin GovTards, need to read this. http://j.mp/1CdpuB

Reply

Jed 3 months ago on Wordpress

I often perceive a belief among public servants that the government’s authoritative status grants it automatic authority and trustworthiness. It’s a feeble assumption and likely to become more feeble as emergent technologies continue to reveal the wisdom of crowds.

This idea that government agencies are “inherently” authoritative may be what blocks the flow of data
... See all content

Reply

jedsundwall 3 months ago on Twitter

@andreadimaio predicts: by 2012 up to one in five government processes will be based on crowdsourced (i.e. external) data http://j.mp/2Zi0EX

Reply

PaulGeraghty 3 months ago on Wordpress

“A prediction we are about to publish says that by 2012 up to one in five government processes will be based on crowdsourced (i.e. external) data.”

Does that statement imply that 20% of external data will be crowdsourced? If so – I agree that it has that potential.

I think it doubly true of local administrations.

In fact crowdsourced information coming into
... See all content

Reply

uberVU - social comments 3 months ago on Wordpress

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by AndreaDiMaio: Fighting the Asymmetry of Government 2.0 http://bit.ly/3TRpRA #gov20…

Reply

Tweets that mention Fighting the Asymmetry of Government 2.0 -- Topsy.com 3 months ago on Wordpress

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Poul J. Hebsgaard and Andrea DiMaio, Patrick Genoud. Patrick Genoud said: RT @AndreaDiMaio Fighting the Asymmetry of Government 2.0 http://bit.ly/3TRpRA #gov20 [...]

Reply

© uberVU Ltd. 2010

Terms of use