Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix

Updated 4 months ago

Source: http://constructionlawva.com/

As I have discussed at Musings on several occasions, the general rule in Virginia is that fraud and construction contracts do not mix.  In other words, most of the time, even where a contractor clearly misrepresents the work performed, an owner can only recover in contract, and not for fraud with its potential for punitive damages and the like.

However, the recent case of Brin v. A Home Come True, Inc, et. al. reminds us all that an exception to this general rule exists.  In Brin, the Fairfax ...

  • 27 comments on this story
PRO

50% positive

Showing 13 relevant reactions out of 27.

Twitter Comment

Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix [link to post] advice for home-owners and contactors

– Posted using Chat Catche

4 months, 2 weeks ago by hpandpsafety (HP&P Safety, Inc.) on Wordpress

Twitter Comment

Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catche

4 months, 2 weeks ago by matthandal (Matt Handal) on Wordpress

Thanks to everyone for their comments today! http://bit.ly/4feQpq

4 months, 2 weeks ago by constructionlaw on Twitter

Thanks to everyone for their comments today!

Christopher G. Hill´s last blog post ..DurretteBradshaw Adds Two Attorneys

4 months, 2 weeks ago by Christopher G. Hill on Wordpress

[...] Read : Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix | Construction Law … Tags: advertising, construction, contractor, facebook, sometimes-fraud, stumbleupon, tort, [...]

4 months, 2 weeks ago by All About Article » Blog Archive » Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix | Construction Law … on Wordpress

RT @constructionlaw New Musings: Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix http://bit.ly/4prjSo

4 months, 2 weeks ago by John Lichtenberger on Wordpress

Thanks as always for your comments Tim. I don’t necessarily read the case that default against the company is default against Gerlinger, though it could be that they are the same and both defaulted when Gerlinger did. Like you I can’t tell.

The best I can tell, it is fraud in the inducement because the Court found that the license issue was the reason for the contract and no contract
... See all content

4 months, 2 weeks ago by Christopher G. Hill on Wordpress

Too funny, I have not read this case in a while. I had a couple cases against A Home Come True.

Do you know if the license argument against the builder was fraud in the inducement? The opinion is unclear. It appears the judge finds in this opinion that he has already ruled against A Home Come True on fraud by default judgment. It also appears the judge holds in this opinion that the default
... See all content

4 months, 2 weeks ago by Timothy R. Hughes on Wordpress

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by build2sustain: Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix: As I have discussed at Musings on several occasions, the genera.. http://bit.ly/1Hy8vO…

4 months, 2 weeks ago by uberVU - social comments on Wordpress

@mynurealtor thanks for the RT of todays Musings! http://bit.ly/4prjSo

4 months, 2 weeks ago by constructionlaw on Twitter

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Christopher Hill, Christopher Hill and James Bedell, RRG. RRG said: RT @constructionlaw: RT @BlawgTweets Nu @constructionlaw : Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix http://bit.ly/16dyDF [...]

4 months, 2 weeks ago by Tweets that mention Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix | Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA -- Topsy.com on Wordpress

Twitter Comment

Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix: As I have discussed at Musings on several occasions, the genera.. [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catche

4 months, 2 weeks ago by build2sustain (James Bedell) on Wordpress

Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix: As I have discussed at Musings on several occasions, the genera.. http://bit.ly/1Hy8vO

4 months, 2 weeks ago by build2sustain on Twitter

© uberVU Ltd. 2010

Terms of use
FEEDBACK