Johnny Holland - It’s all about interaction » Blog Archive » Is UX becoming a commodity?

Kristen Mitchell 2 months, 3 weeks ago on Wordpress

Can we say, without hesitation, that aesthetic appeal (translated into a visually alluring product) is a commodity?

The iPhone frequently breaks several UI guidelines (although the field is still nascent, I acknowledge the guidelines themselves are up for debate, but that’s for another forum) such as consistency, lack of affordances, etc. and is really no more usable than many smartphones on the market (cited in Fred Beecher’s article, “The iPhone is not easy to use. . . “). However, when speaking with UX practitioners or anyone who owns an iPhone, they will say that it is “user friendly”. What do they mean by this?

In our age, where fMRI scans are not yet a feasible means of discovering what is really going on in the brains of individuals when interacting with a product, we instead have to listen to what people say, watch what they do and acknowledge that neither are sufficient to predicting which products will be successful and which will not (although, at times very helpful). This is where I believe triangulation comes in.

Usability, in itself, does not seem like a commodity. However, I would say that an exceptional user experience, is, of which usability is an integral part of. It is user experience that combines usable functionality with interaction design and aesthetic appeal. All three combined are what creates a product that anyone on the street will call, “user-friendly”.

Many designers and developers are looking to create the “next iPhone”. This striving for exceptional design is a commodity which includes usability. In my opinion, it is UX, IxD combined that makes all that happen. ... See all content Hide content

Reply

Joe Fletcher 2 months, 3 weeks ago on Wordpress

Kem, I was going to post this [article] as a response to your article here, but Jeroen told me you were working on a second piece, so I’ll post it here to give you some additional thoughts:

—————-

First, I see many comments dispute the definition of “commodity” used in Kem’s article. I don’t care about the word use, but more about the points, which I find interesting. To start, this is a great talk on design thinking and thinking big from TED that relates to Kem’s hypothesis: Tim Brown, Think Big. I’d suggest watching that first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAinLaT42xY

To paraphrase a great point from the talk, the fact that design has become about consumer products and a tool for consumerism, has made us think small. To a degree, we are at a point of aesthetics. As Nurit mentions in his/her comment in the above article, it’s easier for people to understand what we do from that angle. The problem is when we fall back and explain ourselves with something of such face value, we deteriorate the value we actually add. We explain it to people as aesthetics, and then become a product of our own explanation.

The fact that we’ve been reduced as a field to consumerism and aesthetics makes us think small and become commoditized. In addition to that, when design started becoming a standard company title, we were introduced to organization with a role that is seemingly subjective. This has caused us to start at the bottom since “everyone” can do what we do. With this role, we’ve been reduced to using design thinking to ask “should the icon be left or right aligned”. We should be careful our position doesn’t become our prophecy.

-Usability as Commodity-

Usability as used by many companies is broken regardless of whether we say it’s a “commodity”. Like Design, it has to overcome the stigma of what is does, why it matters, and how it’s properly used. People often use it to tell them what users want, but users [say they] want the familiar and safe. Users will also want everything AND the kitchen sink until it’s given to them. They will express the ability to have control over everything, but it’s not how they act. Telling the difference is key… and one of the most important things. Poor usability and reach is a commodity. Good ones are hard to come by. This is why you hire great designers to compliment research, to help extrapolate what people need, want, and desire. Both working in tandem is what can produce great products. The field isn’t a commodity as much as it’s misunderstood and misused.

-We are *very rare-

We are rare… at least good designers and researchers are rare. Poor practitioners are common. Just think of any “crowdsourcing” site like http://99designs.com/. Anyone *can do usability. Anyone *can do design. They simply may suck at it. Same way anyone can make clothes… even me, but you wouldn’t want to wear them. The challenge is to show why one approach is better. This ties back to the point above. If we continually refer and explain ourselves as proprietors of aesthetics, I worry we will continue this trend of “anyone can cook”. We need to do what any good design does, differentiate.

Dave Malouf in comments mentioned the concerns of Asia coming into the design market [as they are in tech] with lower salaries, and the potential to hurt or saturate our field. However their education system isn’t bred to produce creative designers as a whole. It still sticks to a very regimented system of learning that doesn’t embrace creativity. Someone can correct me on this, but it’s what I’ve seen with schools in Korea, China, and Japan. I’m not concerned about that from a great design perspective, but from a cheap commodity that people who don’t understand the differences, it is somewhat concerning. It continues to perpetuate the incorrect information about our field.

…but I don’t deal with those people anyway 

I do have to justify my presence and job to many people, but we’re in a fairly new field. A field that isn’t taught in many schools, and a field that relies on a side of the brain that is pushed out of most modern education systems. We are very fast to say no one understands us, but it’s not like our discipline has been around for long in the public eye. In the 1960’s I’m sure being a computer programmer was just as odd and confusing.

-From Commodity to Leaders-

The problem isn’t that we’ve become a commodity, although it will be if we accept the hand we’ve been dealt. That will keep us thinking small. This is just the beginning. We’re the people who are slowly crafting our jobs, our roles, our titles. My only ask is we think bigger and broader. Let’s change things, let’s create what’s not there and give a voice to the invisible commodities services that are our skills. Let’s change school systems and how people think. Let’s give a voice to the good and bad. It will become clearer, but it will take time, and it will take us explaining what we do, even if people don’t get it at first. For each great designer there are a 100 people making terrible logos calling it branding for fifty dollars. Put in the extra hours to make your point. Put in the weekend time to figure what you can do to help people change.

It’s just us, I don’t see anyone running to our rescue. ... See all content Hide content

Reply

werkplace 2 months, 3 weeks ago on Twitter

I just declared war here http://bit.ly/lpRjm

Reply

djfrizz 3 months ago on Twitter

UX understands the functional aspects of product use AND the more aesthetic/experiential parts of product design http://bit.ly/1ixSRD !fb

Reply

JDouglass 3 months ago on Twitter

Enjoying the comments on the "UX as Commodity" article http://bit.ly/EhldQ

Reply

Anna Maria D 3 months ago on Wordpress

Dave I was confused by your second post after reading your first, so are you saying it is becoming a commodity or not? I feel like the writer that it is. I don’t know how and where you work but in many companies there is the perception when the development team has neglected to to do due diligence and get the product tested they think of usability as a ribbon on top that says ’ship” . That’s the only way I have seen it work although we try to fight this approach. It is unfortunate.

As an Ixd person I remember the times when I had time to think of a solution and come up with multiple concepts that gave me time to think about what I was doing. The whole thinking process as I design is almost gone and it is so mechanical. now all production. Yes I am sometimes getting ‘melancholic’ because I see my work on a production line. Again commodity. Other Ixd people I know work in stencils reproducing the visual brand of the same thing over and over again. It is repetitive and mechanical and they do not feel like creators of anything but instead producers of designs.

Two of the elements of Ux, ‘Usability’ and ‘Design’ are being reduced to production. how do we stop this mechanical pace of production of visual designs to supply high demand? The writer hits it on the head!

I don’t think you can ever ship the design part of what we do but I take your point that the ‘overwhelming manufacturing mindset’ is hard to overcome. It is a place where intellectual design property is violated with no recourse. Knock-off come near to the real thing. Design is copied and reproduced.

Yes it is hard to reproduce the feeling experience that someone may have with a real Prada bag or iPHONE or whatever else but the production side of Design as a commodity is evident. ... See all content Hide content

Reply

Userexperience ist kein Spaß | Webzeugkoffer Webdesign 3 months ago on Wordpress

[...] Mittlerweile hat es auch die Userexperience (UX) in den Mainstream geschafft. Sie ist hipp und wird verkauft. So it comes as no suprise when the general attitude of stakeholders these days is one of a shopper saying: ‘One McUser Experience with usability fries please.’Kem Kramer, Is UX becoming a commodity? [...]

Reply

Dave Malouf 3 months ago on Wordpress

Anna, I agree that “usability” is a commodity of this decade like quality was in the 90’s. In my talk during From Business to Buttons reviewed somewhere on this crazy site, or just visible from http://businesstobuttons.com/

it is exactly that point that I make. And further, design (forget user experience; does this term mean anything any more?) has elements that are definitely commodities. Walk into a IDSA event and you will hear a lot of worries about China & Korea & low salaries. But holistic design innovation that traditional UX supports ain’t close to being a commodity. Looking at Asia, this type of thinking is very difficult cultural to pass on, due to the overwhelming manufacturing mindset. Even in Japan, “experience” is not really an understood design element like it is in Europe and the US. So the critical mass required to make this really a commodity hasn’t happened yet. It will. ;-), just not yet. ... See all content Hide content

Reply

werkplace 3 months ago on Twitter

Look at what some idiot commented on... http://bit.ly/2dLMYX #ux

Reply

ChrisMcQueen 3 months ago on Twitter

Is UX becoming a commodity?:

After 10 years in the field, I woke up one day to realise that my service as a UX.. http://bit.ly/1ACmtJ

Reply

pfinette 3 months ago on Twitter

Some excellent thoughts from the @johnnyholland crew on "Usability as a commodity": http://bit.ly/1Y5tVb

Reply

hntchen 3 months ago on Twitter

Is UX becoming a commodity? ...Kem-Laurin Kramer of RIM writes in JH http://ow.ly/AIFb

Reply

mTp 3 months ago on Wordpress

I am going to also put in my, Really?

I have been working in interaction design for 15 years. I can agree with a couple of things here: 1) that there is more attention being given to the human in the equation of making software products and 2) that the title changes many times. Otherwise, a commodity, really? Not according to any economics theories I have read.

Software features are a commodity. The thing companies have realized is that user experience is the main tool they have to differentiate their software in the great sea of stuff out there.

Interaction designers are still hard to come by. I get contacted every 2 weeks for another position that a company has been searching for someone for months. With a large lack of qualified interaction designers in the world it is really hard to get interaction design to the level of commodity. Maybe once you write code that can create average user experiences from a feature lists and problem sets, then we might get to commodity.

I think you have your definition all wrong. For example here is what Wikipedia defines commodity as: “A commodity is some good for which there is demand, but which is supplied without qualitative differentiation across a market.”

Commodity? The qualitative differentiation across the marketplace of software products and services is enormous. User experience is not a commodity - by definition.

mTp ... See all content Hide content

Reply

Dave Malouf 3 months ago on Wordpress

really? I’m not seeing it at all. EVEN in the consumer world the lack of understanding of what UX or even design is REALLY all about is staggering, demonstrated fully by the lack of mojo in your own organization’s products. Yes, the iPhone has gotten people’s attention and everyone is clamoring for an “expert” but there are so few experts who truly know how to bring it all together, coupled with the reality that a 24-mo lifecycle is not enough time to do it, demonstrates to me that true design (forget about UX) is not anywhere close to a commodity in the pejorative sense of the term beyond mere “ease of use” and even that well isn’t really done right either.

Let’s not confuse lip service with actual reality. ... See all content Hide content

Reply

paulomartires 3 months ago on Twitter

artigo mt interessante, para reflectir: http://bit.ly/3FYRfj

Reply

johnnyholland 3 months ago on Twitter

New on JH Magazine: Is UX becoming a commodity? http://is.gd/4QNfF

Reply